Kite Data Reference Guide

About This Guide

This reference guide is the primary source of documentation for the Kite Data module. It covers the following topics: * high level organization of the APIs * primary classes and interfaces * intended usage * available extension points for customization * implementation information (where helpful and appropriate)

From here on, this guide assumes you are already familiar with the basic design and functionality of the following technologies: * HDFS * Hadoop MapReduce * Java SE 6

If you are familiar with Avro, data serialization techniques, common compression algorithms (for example, Gzip, Snappy), advanced Hadoop MapReduce topics (for example, input split calculation), and traditional data management topics (for example, partitioning schemes, metadata management), you will benefit even more.

Overview of the Data Module

The Kite Data module is a set of APIs for interacting with datasets in the Hadoop ecosystem. It is specifically built to handle direct reading and writing of datasets in storage subsystems such as the Hadoop Distributed FileSystem (HDFS). The Kite Data module provides familiar, stream-oriented and random-access APIs that reduce the complexity of data serialization, partitioning, organization, and metadata system integration.

These APIs do not replace or supersede any of the existing Hadoop APIs. Instead, the Data module acts as a targeted application of those APIs for its stated use case. You will still use the HDFS or Avro APIs directly when you have use cases outside of direct dataset create, delete, read, and write operations. When you are building applications or systems such as data integration services, the Kite Data module is usually superior in its default choices, data organization, and metadata system integration, when compared to custom-built code.

In keeping with the overarching theme and principles of Kite, the Data module is prescriptive. Rather than present a do-all Swiss Army knife library, this module makes specific design choices that guide you toward well known patterns that make sense for many, if not all, cases. If you have advanced or niche use cases, you might find it difficult, suboptimal, or even impossible to do unusual things.

Limiting your options is not the goal. The Kite Data module is designed to be immediately useful, obvious, and in line with what most users want out of the box. Whenever revealing an option creates complexity, or otherwise requires you to research and assess additional choices, the option is omitted.

These APIs are designed to easily fit in with dependency injection frameworks such as Spring and Google Guice. You can use constructor injection when using these kinds of systems. Alternatively, if you prefer not to use DI frameworks, you can use the builder-style helper classes that come with many of the critical classes. By convention, these builders are always inner static classes named Builder, contained within their constituent classes.

The primary actors in the Data module are entities, dataset repositories, datasets, dataset readers, dataset writers, and metadata providers. Most of these objects are interfaces, permitting multiple implementations, each with different functionality. The current release contains an implementation of each of these components for the Hadoop FileSystem abstraction (found in the org.kitesdk.data.filesystem package), for Hive (found in the org.kitesdk.data.hcatalog package), and for HBase (see the section about Dataset Repository URIs for how to access it).

While, in theory, any implementation of Hadoop’s FileSystem abstract class is supported by the Kite Data module, only the local and HDFS filesystem implementations are tested and officially supported.

If you’re not already familiar with Avro schemas, now is a good time to go read a little more about them. You don’t have to worry about the details of how objects are serialized, but you must be able to specify the schema to which entities of a dataset must conform. The rest of this guide assumes you know how to define a schema.

Dataset Repositories and Metadata Providers

A dataset repository is a physical storage location for datasets. In keeping with the relational database analogy, a dataset repository is the equivalent of a database of tables. You can organize datasets into different dataset repositories for reasons related to logical grouping, security and access control, backup policies, and so on. A dataset repository is represented by instances of the org.kitesdk.data.DatasetRepository interface in the Kite Data module. An instance of DatasetRepository acts as a factory for datasets, supplying methods for creating, loading, and deleting datasets. Each dataset belongs to exactly one dataset repository. There’s no built-in support for moving or copying datasets between repositories. MapReduce and other execution engines provide copy functionality, if required.

DatasetRepository Interface

<E> Dataset<E> create(String, DatasetDescriptor);
<E> Dataset<E> load(String);
<E> Dataset<E> update(String);
boolean delete(String);
boolean exists(String);
Collection<String> list();

The Kite Data module ships with a DatasetRepository implementation org.kitesdk.data.filesystem.FileSystemDatasetRepository built for operating on datasets stored in a filesystem supported by Hadoop’s FileSystem abstraction. This implementation requires a root directory under which datasets are stored, and a Configuration used to get the FileSystem for that directory. Optionally, you can supply a metadata provider as well. With a DatasetRepository, you can freely interact with datasets while the implementation manages files and directories in the underlying filesystem. The metadata provider is used to store and retrieve dataset schemas and other related information needed to read and write data (more about them later).

The Kite Data module supports URI-based instantiation to build DatasetRepository instances. The following code example opens a DatasetRepository that stores its data in HDFS.

// get a repository with data stored in hdfs:/data
DatasetRepository hdfsRepo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hdfs:/data");

For more information, see the repository URI section.

Instantiating FileSystemDatasetRepository using its builder is also straightforward, and supports additional options such as supplying a specific Hadoop Configuration. This demonstrates building a DatasetRepository in a Configured class, like Tool:

DatasetRepository hdfsRepo = new FileSystemDatasetRepository.Builder()
  .configuration(this.getConf())
  .rootDirectory(new Path("/data"))
  .build();

This example uses the currently configured default Hadoop FileSystem, typically an HDFS cluster. Since Hadoop also supports a “local” implementation of FileSystem, it’s possible to use the Data APIs to interact with data residing on a local OS filesystem. This is especially useful during development and basic functional testing of your code. The Path object tells the repository builder the path and configured filesystem for data storage.

DatasetRepository localRepo = new FileSystemDatasetRepository.Builder()
  .configuration(getConf())
  .rootDirectory(new Path("file:/tmp/test-data"))
  .build();

// alternative URI-based instantiation:
localRepo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:file:/data")

Using these instances of DatasetRepository, you can create new datasets, and existing datasets can be loaded or deleted. Here’s a more complete example of creating a dataset to store application event data. You’ll notice a few new classes that are discussed later in this document.

// Instantiate a DatasetRepository backed by HDFS, stored under /data
DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hdfs:/data")

// Create the dataset "users" with the schema defined in the file User.avsc.
Dataset users = repo.create(
  "users",
  new DatasetDescriptor.Builder()
    .schema(new File("User.avsc"))
    .build()
);

Related to the dataset repository, the metadata provider stores information needed to read from and write to datasets in a repository. That information is created with a dataset and after that is managed by the repository and its metadata provider.

The providers implement org.kitesdk.data.MetadataProvider, which defines a service provider interface used to interact with a service that provides dataset metadata information to the rest of the Data APIs. This interface defines the contract that metadata services must provide to the library, and specifically, the DatasetRepository.

MetadataProvider Interface

DatasetDescriptor create(String, DatasetDescriptor);
DatasetDescriptor load(String);
DatasetDescriptor update(String, DatasetDescriptor);
boolean delete(String);
boolean exists(String);

MetadataProvider implementations act as a bridge between the Data module and centralized metadata repositories. An obvious example of this (in the Hadoop ecosystem) is HCatalog and the Hive metastore. By providing an implementation that makes the necessary API calls to HCatalog’s REST service, any and all datasets are immediately consumable by systems compatible with HCatalog, the storage system represented by the DatasetRepository implementation, and the format in which the data is written. As it turns out, that’s a pretty tall order. In keeping with Kite’s goal of reducing rather than adding options, you are encouraged to

1. use HCatalog
2. allow this library to default to Snappy-compressed Avro data files
3. use systems that also integrate with HCatalog (directly or indirectly).

In this way, this library acts as a fourth integration point for working with data in HDFS that is HCatalog-aware, in addition to Hive, Pig, and MapReduce input/output formats.

You aren’t expected to use metadata providers directly. Typically, the URI used to open a DatasetRepository also holds information about the metadata provider.

Most DatasetRepository implementations accept instances of MetadataProvider plugins, and make whatever calls are needed as users interact with the Data APIs. You might have noticed that no metadata provider is specified when the code instantiated FileSystemDatasetRepository. That’s because FileSystemDatasetRepository uses an implementation of MetadataProvider called FileSystemMetadataProvider by default. You are free to explicitly pass a different implementation using the metadataProvider(MetadataProvider) method on FileSystemDatasetRepository.Builder if you want to change this behavior.

The FileSystemMetadataProvider (also in the package org.kitesdk.data.filesystem) plugin stores dataset metadata information on a Hadoop FileSystem in a hidden directory. As with its sibling FileSystemDatasetRepository, its constructor accepts a Hadoop FileSystem object and a base directory. When you need to store metadata, FileSystemMetadataProvider creates a directory under the supplied base directory with the dataset name (if it doesn’t yet exist), and serializes the dataset descriptor information to a set of files in a directory named .metadata.

Example: Explicitly configuring FileSystemDatasetRepository with FileSystemMetadataProvider

FileSystem fileSystem = FileSystem.get(new Configuration());
Path basePath = new Path("/data");

MetadataProvider metaProvider = new FileSystemMetadataProvider(
  fileSystem, basePath);

DatasetRepository repo = new FileSystemDatasetRepository.Builder()
  .configuration(getConf())
  .metadataProvider(metaProvider)
  .build();

Configured this way, data and metadata are stored together, side by side, on whatever filesystem Hadoop is currently configured to use. Later, when you create a dataset, you’ll see the resultant file and directory structure created as a result of this configuration.

It’s very common to store metadata in the Hive/HCatalog Metastore (the terms are used interchangeably), since this opens datasets up to integration with any system that can work with Hive, such as BI tools, or Cloudera Impala.

When using Hive/HCatalog you have two options for specifying the location of the data files. You can let Hive/HCatalog manage the location of the data, the so-called “managed tables” option, in which case the data is stored in the warehouse directory that is configured by the Hive/HCatalog installation (see the hive.metastore.warehouse.dir setting in hive-site.xml). Alternatively, you can provide an explicit Hadoop FileSystem and root directory for datasets, just like FileSystemDatasetRepository. The latter option is referred to as “external tables” in the context of Hive/HCatalog.

Example: Creating a HCatalogDatasetRepository with managed tables

DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hive");

Example: Creating a HCatalogDatasetRepository with external tables

DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hive:/data");

static DatasetRepository open(URI);
static DatasetRepository open(String);

static RandomAccessDatasetRepository openRandomAccess(URI);
static RandomAccessDatasetRepository openRandomAccess(String);

DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hive");

DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hbase:zk1,zk2,zk3");

Datasets

Summary

• A dataset is a collection of entities.
• A dataset is represented by the interface Dataset.
• The Hadoop FileSystem implementation of a dataset…
  • is stored as Snappy-compressed Avro data files by default, or optionally in the column-oriented Parquet file format
  • is made up of zero or more files in a directory.
• You can work with a subset of Dataset Entities using the Views API.

A dataset is a collection of zero or more entities. All datasets have a name and an associated dataset descriptor. The dataset descriptor, as the name implies, describes all aspects of the dataset. Primarily, the descriptor information is the dataset’s required schema and format, and its optional location (a repository URI) and optional partition strategy. A descriptor must be provided at the time a dataset is created. The schema is defined using the Avro Schema APIs.

Entities must all conform to the same schema; however, that schema can evolve based on a set of well defined rules. The relational database analog of a dataset is a table.

Datasets are represented by the org.kitesdk.data.Dataset interface, which is parameterized by the Java type of the entities it is used to read and write.

Dataset Interface for entity type <E>

String getName();
DatasetDescriptor getDescriptor();

DatasetWriter<E> newWriter();
DatasetReader<E> newReader();

Dataset getPartition(PartitionKey, boolean);
Iterable<Dataset<E>> getPartitions();

Up to this point, this example has omitted the Dataset type parameter for brevity. To demonstrate the correct use of types, the remaining examples include the type parameter whenever you create or load a Dataset.

DatasetRepository repo = ...
Dataset<User> users = repo.load("users");

Dataset implementations decide how to physically store the entities within the dataset. You do not instantiate implementations of the Dataset interface directly. Instead, implementations of the DatasetRepository act as a factory for the appropriate Dataset implementation.

The included Hadoop FileSystemDatasetRepository provides a Dataset implementation called FileSystemDataset. This dataset implementation stores data in the configured Hadoop FileSystem as Snappy-compressed Avro data files, or optionally as Parquet files.

Avro data files were selected as the default because they:

• are supported by all components of CDH
• are language agnostic
• support block compression
• have a compact binary representation
• are natively splittable by Hadoop MapReduce while compressed.

Parquet, on the other hand, is a good choice for wide tables with a large number of columns (30 or so is considered “large” in this context), particularly if the data is queried using Impala, since Impala can take advantage of the fact that Parquet is stored in columnar form and restricts the data being read to the columns in the query.

Upon creation of dataset, you must provide a name and a dataset descriptor to the DatasetRepository#create() method. The descriptor, represented by the org.kitesdk.data.DatasetDescriptor class, holds all metadata associated with the dataset, the most important of which is the schema. Schemas are always represented using Avro’s Schema APIs, regardless of how the data is stored by the underlying dataset implementation. This simplifies the API, letting you focus on a single schema definition language for all datasets. In an effort to support different styles of schema definition, the DatasetDescriptor.Builder class supports a number of convenience methods for defining or attaching a schema.

DatasetDescriptor Class

org.apache.avro.Schema getSchema();
Format getFormat()
URI getLocation()
PartitionStrategy getPartitionStrategy();
boolean isPartitioned();

DatasetDescriptor.Builder Class

Builder schema(Schema schema);
Builder schema(File file);
Builder schema(InputStream inputStream);
Builder schemaUri(URI uri);
Builder schemaUri(String uri);
Builder schemaLiteral(String json);

Builder partitionStrategy(PartitionStrategy partitionStrategy);

DatasetDescriptor build();

Note

Some of the less important or more specialized methods have been elided here in the interest of simplicity.

From the methods in the DatasetDescriptor.Builder, you can see Avro schemas can be defined in a few different ways. Here, for instance, is an example of creating a dataset with a schema defined in a file on the local filesystem.

DatasetRepository repo = ...
Dataset<User> users = repo.create("users",
  new DatasetDescriptor.Builder()
    .schema(new File("User.avsc"))
    .build()
);

Just as easily, a schema could be loaded from a Java classpath resource. This example uses Guava’s Resources for resolution, but you could almost as easily use Java’s java.util.ClassLoader directly.

DatasetRepository repo = ...
Dataset users = repo.create("users",
  new DatasetDescriptor.Builder()
    .schema(Resources.getResource("Users.avsc"))
    .build()
);

An instance of Dataset acts as a factory for both reader and writer streams. Each implementation is free to produce stream implementations that make sense for the underlying storage system. The FileSystemDataset implementation, for example, produces streams that read from, or write to, Avro data files or Parquet files on a Hadoop FileSystem implementation.

Reader and writer streams both function similarly to Java’s standard IO streams, but are specialized. As indicated in the Dataset interface earlier, both interfaces are generic. The type parameter indicates the type of entity that they produce or consume, respectively.

DatasetReader Interface

void open();
void close();
boolean isOpen();

boolean hasNext();
E next();

DatasetWriter Interface

void open();
void close();
boolean isOpen();

void write(E);
void flush();

Both readers and writers are single-use objects with a well defined lifecycle. You must open instances of both types (or the implementations of each, rather) prior to invoking any of the IO-generating methods such as DatasetReader’s hasNext() or next(), or DatasetWriter’s write() or flush(). Once a stream is closed via the close() method, no further IO is permitted, and you cannot reopen the stream.

Writing to a dataset always follows the same sequence of events. You obtain an instance of a Dataset from a DatasetRepository, either by creating a new or loading an existing dataset. With a reference to a Dataset, you can obtain a writer using its newWriter() method, open it, write any number of entities, flush as necessary, and close it to release resources back to the system. The use of flush() and close() can dramatically affect data durability. Implementations of the DatasetWriter interface are free to define the semantics of data durability as appropriate for their storage subsystem. See the implementation Javadoc on either the streams or the dataset for more information.

Example: Writing to a Hadoop FileSystem

DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hdfs:/data");

/*
 * Let's assume MyInteger.avsc is defined as follows:
 * {
 *   "type": "record",
 *   "name": "MyInteger",
 *   "fields": [
 *     { "type": "integer", "name": "i" }
 *   ]
 * }
 */
Dataset<GenericRecord> integers = repo.create("integers",
  new DatasetDescriptor.Builder()
    .schema("MyInteger.avsc")
    .build()
);

/*
 * Getting a writer never performs IO, so it's safe to do this outside of
 * the try block. Here we're using Avro Generic records, discussed in
 * greater details later. See the Entities section.
 */
DatasetWriter<GenericRecord> writer = integers.newWriter();

try {
  writer.open();

  for (int i = 0; i < Integer.MAX_VALUE; i++) {
    writer.write(
      new GenericRecordBuilder(integers.getDescriptor().getSchema())
        .set("i", i)
        .build()
    );
  }
} finally {
  // Always explicitly close writers!
  writer.close();
}

Reading data from an existing dataset is equally straightforward. DatasetReaders implement the standard Iterator and Iterable interfaces, so Java’s for-each syntax works and is the easiest way to get entities from a reader. If calling next() without using for-each syntax, keep in mind that it is incorrect to call next() after the reader is exhausted (that is, no more entities remain) and an exception is thrown. Instead, you must use the hasNext() method to test if the reader can produce further data.

Example: Reading from a Hadoop FileSystem

DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hdfs:/data");

// Load the integers dataset.
Dataset<GenericReader> integers = repo.get("integers");

DatasetReader<GenericRecord> reader = integers.newReader();

try {
  reader.open();

  for (GenericRecord record : reader) {
    System.out.println("i: " + record.get("i"));
  }
} finally {
  reader.close();
}

Deleting a dataset — an operation as destructive as dropping a table in a relational database — works as expected.

Example: Deleting an existing dataset

DatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.open("repo:hdfs:/data");

if (repo.delete("integers")) {
  System.out.println("Deleted dataset integers");
}

As discussed earlier, all operations performed on dataset repositories, datasets, and their associated readers and writers are tightly integrated with the dataset repository’s configured metadata provider. Deleting a dataset like this, for example, removes the data as well as the associated metadata. All applications that use the Data module APIs automatically see changes made by one another if they share the same configuration. This is an incredibly powerful concept, allowing systems to become immediately aware of data as soon as it’s committed to storage.

<S> Builder identity(String, Class<S>, int);
Builder hash(String, int);
Builder year(String);
Builder month(String);
Builder day(String);
Builder hour(String);
Builder minute(String);
Builder dateFormat(String, String);

PartitionStrategy build();

{
  "name": "User",
  "type": "record",
  "fields": [
    { "name": "id",           "type": "long"   },
    { "name": "username",     "type": "string" },
    { "name": "emailAddress", "type": "string" },
    { "name": "segment",      "type": "long"   }
  ]
}

DatasetRepository repo = ...

Dataset<User> usersDataset = repo.create(
  "users",
  new DatasetDescriptor.Builder()
    .schema(new File("User.avsc"))
    .partitionStrategy(
      new PartitionStrategy.Builder().identity("segment", Long.class, 1024).build()
    ).build()
);

id  username  emailAddress  segment
--  --------  ------------  -------
100 A         A@a.com       1
101 B         B@b.com       1
102 C         C@c.com       1
103 D         D@d.com       2
104 E         E@e.com       2

DatasetRepository repo = ...

Dataset<User> users = repo.create(
  "users",
  new DatasetDescriptor.Builder()
    .schema(new File("User.avsc"))
    .partitionStrategy(
      new PartitionStrategy.Builder()
        .identity("segment", Long.class, 1024)  // Partition first by segment
        .hash("emailAddress", 3)                // and then by hash(email) % 3
        .build()
    ).build()

E get(Key);
boolean put(E);
boolean delete(Key);
boolean delete(E);
long increment(Key, String, long);

RandomAccessDatasetRepository repo = DatasetRepositories.openRandomAccess("repo:hbase:...");
RandomAccessDataset<User> users = repo.open("users");
users.put(...);

Avro schema (User.avsc)
-----------------------
{
  "name": "User",
  "type": "record",
  "fields": [
    { "name": "username",    "type": "string",
      "mapping": { "type": "key", "value": "0" } },

    { "name": "emailAddress", "type": [ "string", "null" ],
      "mapping": { "type": "column", "value": "user:emailAddress" } },
  ]
}

{
  "name": "conflictVersion",
  "type": "long",
  "default": 0,
  "mapping": { "type": "occVersion" }
}

View<User> orange = users.with(“favoriteColor”, “orange”)

long OCT_4 = new org.joda.time.DateTime(2012, 10, 4, 0, 0).getMillis();
long APR_10 = new org.joda.time.DateTime(2013, 4, 10, 0, 0).getMillis();
View<Event> v = events.from(“timestamp”, OCT_4).to(“timestamp”, APR_10);

Entities

Summary

• An entity is a record in a dataset.
• Entities can be POJOs, Avro GenericRecords, or Avro generated (specific) records.
• When in doubt, use GenericRecords.

An entity is a single record. The name “entity” is used rather than “record” because the latter caries a connotation of a simple list of primitives, while the former evokes the notion of a POJO (e.g. in JPA). That said, the terms are used interchangeably. An entity can take one of three forms, per your preference:

1. A plain old Java object

   When you supply a POJO, the library uses reflection to write the object out to storage. While not the fastest, this is the easiest way to get up and running. Users are encouraged to consider Avro GenericRecords for production systems, or after they become familiar with the APIs.

2. An Avro GenericRecord

   An Avro GenericRecord instance can be used to supply entities that represent a schema without using custom types for each kind of entity. These objects are easy to create and manipulate (see Avro’s GenericRecordBuilder class), especially in code that has no knowledge of specific object types (such as libraries). Serialization of generic records is fast, but requires use of the Avro APIs. This is recommended for most users, in most cases.

3. An Avro specific type

   Advanced users might choose to use Avro’s code generation support to create classes that implicitly know how to serialize themselves. While the fastest of the options, this requires specialized knowledge of Avro, code generation, and handling of custom types.

Note that entities aren’t represented by any particular type in the Data APIs. In each of the above three cases, the entities described are either simple POJOs or are Avro objects. Remember that what has been described here is only the in memory representation of the entity; the Data module might store the data in HDFS in a different serialization format. By default, this is the Avro data file serialization, but it can be Parquet files or an HBase format if the HBase repository is being used.

Entities can be complex types, representing data structures with a few string attributes, or as complex as necessary. See Example: User entity schema and POJO class for an example of a valid Avro schema, and its associated POJO.

Example: User entity schema and POJO class

Avro schema (User.avsc)
-----------------------
{
  "name": "User",
  "type": "record",
  "fields": [
    // two required fields.
    { "name": "id",          "type": "long" },
    { "name": "username",    "type": "string" },

    // emailAddress is optional; it's value can be a string or a null.
    { "name": "emailAddress", "type": [ "string", "null" ] },

    // friendIds is an array with elements of type long.
    { "name": "friendIds",   "type": { "type": "array", "items": "long" } },
  ]
}

User POJO (User.java)
---------------------
public class User {

  private Long id;
  private String username;
  private String emailAddress;
  private List<Long> friendIds;

  public User() {
    friendIds = new ArrayList<Long>();
  }

  public Long getId() {
    return id;
  }

  public void setId(Long id) {
    this.id = id;
  }

  public String getUsername() {
    return username;
  }

  public void setUsername(String username) {
    this.username = username;
  }

  public String getEmailAddress() {
    return emailAddress;
  }

  public void setEmailAddress(String emailAddress) {
    this.emailAddress = emailAddress;
  }

  public List<Long> getFriendIds() {
    return friendIds;
  }

  public void setFriendIds(List<Long> friendIds) {
    this.friendIds = friendIds;
  }

  /*
   * It's fine to have methods that the schema doesn't know about. They'll
   * just be ignored during serialization.
   */
  public void addFriend(Friend friend) {
    if (!friendIds.contains(friend.getId()) {
      friendIds.add(friend.getId());
    }
  }

}

Instead of defining a POJO, you can use Avro’s GenericRecordBuilder to create a generic entity that conforms to the User schema defined earlier.

Example: Using Avro’s GenericRecordBuilder to create a generic entity

/*
 * Load the schema from User.avsc.
 */
Schema userSchema = new Schema.Parser().parse(new File("User.avsc"));

/*
 * The GenericRecordBuilder constructs a new record and ensures that
 * all the necessary fields are set with values of an appropriate type.
 */
GenericRecord genericUser = new GenericRecordBuilder(userSchema)
  .set("id", 1L)
  .set("username", "janedoe")
  .set("emailAddress", "jane@doe.com")
  .set("friendIds", Collections.<Long>emptyList())
  .build();

Appendix